•  
  •  
 

Commentary Type

Open Commentary

Thread

Colin A. Chapman and Michael A. Huffman, Why do we want to think humans are different?

Abstract

This commentary discusses various shortcomings in Chapman & Huffman’s (2018) denial of differences between human beings and animals and the ethical consequences they think turn on this. Rationality is proposed as a candidate for such a difference, one that also has acceptable ethical consequences.

Author Biography

Nick Zangwill, Honorary Research Fellow, University College London and Visiting Professor, University of Lincoln, works in moral philosophy, aesthetics, metaphysics, epistemology and philosophy of mind. Website

DOI

10.51291/2377-7478.1686

Share

COinS