Citation
Crane, Tim (2026) Could 'real existing AI' be sentient?. Animal Sentience 38(17)
Thread
Jonathan Birch, Précis of The Edge of Sentience: Risk and Precaution in Humans, Other Animals, and AI
Abstract
Jonathan Birch is rightly sceptical about the idea that today’s AI machines (e.g. LLMs) are candidates for sentience. Nonetheless, he gives three reasons for taking the future possibility of AI sentience seriously. I dispute them all. Birch fails to distinguish the very idea of an artificial mind from computational AI (what I call ‘Real Existing AI’); he does not adequately distinguish a simulation from a replica or copy; and he fails to acknowledge that the appeal to computational functionalism in this context is straightforwardly question-begging.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.51291/2377-7478.1959
Included in
Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Human-Computer Interaction Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons