Article Title
Abstract
A survey of 600 journal subscribers produced 156 responses (26%). Responses were sorted into four groups – institutions and three groups of individuals (veterinarians, research scientists, animal welfare advocates, and others). The readers were mainly satisfied with the material's quality – 82% rated the journal as excellent or good. Fifty-eight percent (58%) responded that the journal needed more objectivity, and 38% responded that objectivity should stay the same. The responses were helpful and would be considered as the journal moved forward.
Recommended Citation
Rowan, Andrew N.
(1982)
"Reader Survey,"
International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems: Vol. 3:
No.
4, Article 3.
Available at:
https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/ijsap/vol3/iss4/3